Comparison between laparoscopic and conventional omental patch repair for perforated duodenal ulcer

Simple laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer without. All patients who underwent omental patch repair at two universityaffiliated. Sutureless onlay omental patch for the laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers. More than half of the cases are female and they are usually older and. The use of laparoscopic management as a method for the treatment of duodenal perforation is gaining ground but is not routine in many centers. Complications are encountered in 10%20% of these patients and 2%14% of the ulcers will perforate 2, 3. Laparoscopic graham patch repair of a perforated marginal ulcer 6 yrs after rygb duration. So jbkum ckfernandes mlgoh p comparison between laparoscopic and conventional omental patch repair for perforated duodenal ulcer. Even though its nearer to cpt 43840, still you should not code it. The only selection criterion was availability of expertise for laparoscopic repair on the day of admission. As there is no specific cpt for graham patch operation in the current cpt manual, you should bill. Lau wy, leung kl, kwong kh, davey ic, robertson c, dawson jj, chung sc, li ak.

Predicting mortality and morbidity of patients operated on. Laparoscopic repair of peptic ulcer perforation without omental patch versus conventional open repair. Darzi a, carey pd, menziesgow n, monson jrt 1993 preliminary denal ulcer. Laparoscopic treatment of gastroduodenal perforations. Laparoscopic repair for perforated duodenal ulcer was first described in 19903. Though early results were impressive, they were hampered by various shortcomings including selection bias only reported on patients with. Perforations larger than 3 cms have also been reported to be successfully repaired with this technique 10. Lau h 2004 laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcerpatients and methodsthis study included 50 patients presented by perforated peptic ulcer between july 2009 and august 2014. The sixth decision regarding perforated duodenal ulcer. Laparoscopic omental patch repair lopr of perforated peptic ulcer ppu was introduced two decades ago. Since laparoscopic repair procedures for perforated peptic ulcers were first reported in. Laparoscopic repair of peptic ulcer perforation without.

Since then, several methods of laparoscopic repair have. Management of perforated gastric and duodenal ulcers. This belief is a now matter of debate as multiple studies showed the addition of an omental patch does not add benefits to a simple suture repair, but it significantly increases the operation time. Oct 24, 2005 so jby, kum ml, fernandes ml, goh p 1996 comparison tive time. Because the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic approaches for the treatment of perforated peptic ulcer ppu have been fully recognized, laparoscopic repair of ppu lppu has become a widely accepted procedure.

Jan 01, 2001 so jbkum ckfernandes mlgoh p comparison between laparoscopic and conventional omental patch repair for perforated duodenal ulcer. This study included 50 patients presented by perforated peptic ulcer between july 2009 and august 2014. The surgeon uses sutures to secure the patch and close the perforation. The laparoscopic procedure was completed in 45 patients, and 15 25% patients required conversion to an open repair for the following reasons.

Between october 1996 and may 2004, 60 patients underwent laparoscopic and 162 patients underwent open repair of perforated peptic ulcers in. This purpose has been performing by conventional open surgey. So jby, kum ml, fernandes ml, goh p 1996 comparison tive time. All patients diagnosed clinically with perforated peptic ulcers, admitted to vs hospital during the period of january 20june 2014, were prospectively nonrandomized to undergo either conventional open or laparoscopic suture omental patch repair consent and cafeteria approach. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety and outcome of laparoscopic surgery without omental patch for perforated ulcers in comparison with conventional. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer. Laparoscopic versus open omental patch repair for early. A comparison of laparoscopic and open repair of perforated. So jb, kum ck, fernandes ml, goh p 1996 comparison between laparoscopic and conventional omental patch repair for perforated duodenal ulcer. A randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer using suture or sutureless technique.

Comparison between laparoscopic and conventional omental patch. So, we conducted this study to assess the efficacy of laparoscopic approach in perforated peptic ulcer repair. Perforated peptic ulcer is a common abdominal disease that is treated by surgery. Early diagnosis, prompt resuscitation and urgent surgical intervention are essential to improve outcomes. Duodenal ulcer perforations are a common cause of peritonitis. The management of large perforations of duodenal ulcers bmc. Laparoscopic repair lr for perforated peptic ulcer ppu has been introduced since 1990. An updated metaanalysis of laparoscopic versus open repair for. The management of large perforations of duodenal ulcers. Simple laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer.

Patients and methods between october 1993 and october 1997, 30 patients underwent laparoscopic graham patch repair of perforated duodenal ulcers and 16 had an open repair. They were submitted to laparoscopic omental patch repair with thorough peritoneal wash. Laparoscopic repair of perforted duodenal ulcer has many advantages as less. Comparison of laparoscopic vs open repair for perforated. Three of laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated.

Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer series. Laparoscopic management of duodenal perforation sages. Single incision laparoscopic peptic ulcer repair with the. Main outcome measures morbidity, operating time, analgesic requirements, length of.

Bhogal rh, athwal r, durkin d, deakin m, cheruvu cv 2008 comparison between open and laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer disease. Duodenal perforation is a common acute surgical emergency. An updated metaanalysis of laparoscopic versus open repair. This article is about the technique used for the laparoscopic repair of the duodenal perforation by grahams patch with a twist in the conventional technique. A prospective study nitin agarwal1, arun gupta2, bk jain2 and ram niwas saran3 1department of surgery, renal transplant unit, postgraduate institute of medical education and research pgimer and dr.

Laparoscopic single figure of eight suturing omentopexy for the. However, there are concerns associated with laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers without omental. Although many studies comparing lr with open repair or have been published, controversy remains. Comparison between laparoscopic and conventional omental patch repair for perforated duodenal ulcer. The classic, pedicled omental patch that is performed for the plugging of these perforations was first described by cellanjones in 1929, although it is commonly, and wrongly attributed to graham, who described the use of a free graft of the omentum to repair the perforation in 1937. A rapid method of treatment in perforated duodenal ulcer. The results of some clinical trials suggest that laparoscopic surgery could be a better strategy than open surgery in the correction of perforated peptic ulcer but the evidence is not strongly. Usually the only surgical procedure that is necessary is simple closure with or without omental patch.

Comparison of closure of gastric perforation ulcers with. However, laparoscopic treatment has been shown to be reliable. Perforated peptic ulcer is a common surgical emergency. Perforated peptic ulcer ppu is relatively rare, but lifethreatening with the mortality varying from 10% to 40% 2, 46. Laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated duodenal peptic ulcer. Although many studies comparing lr with open repair or have been.

Laparoscopic omental patch repair of peptic ulcer perforation. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes between laparoscopic and open omental patch repair lopr versus or in patients with similar presentation of perforated peptic ulcer ppu. Society of american gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgeons sages 1,505 views. Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer. Laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer. Outcome of laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal. A comparison of laparoscopic versus open repair for the. Simple repair of perforated peptic ulcers without an omental patch significantly shortens the operation time. Sutureless onlay omental patch for the laparoscopic repair of. A prospective study nitin agarwal1, arun gupta2, bk jain2 and ram niwas saran3 1department of surgery, renal transplant unit, postgraduate institute of medical education and research pgimer and. Jun 25, 2005 duodenal ulcer perforations are a common cause of peritonitis. The operation was carried out on a 49 yr old male patient. Every year peptic ulcer disease pud affects 4 milion people around the world.

Role of laparoscopic surgery for management of duodenal. Exploratory laparotomy and omental patch repair remains the gold standard and laparoscopic surgery should be considered when expertise is available. The classic triad of sudden onset of abdominal pain, tachycardia and abdominal rigidity is the hallmark of perforated peptic ulcer. Diagnosis and treatment of perforated or bleeding peptic. Comparison between laparoscopic and conventional omental. There is great controversy regarding the choice of procedure for perforated duodenal ulcer patients. Role of laparoscopic surgery for management of duodenal ulcer. The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic omental patch repair.

Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer was first reported in 1990 and due to some advantages of this procedure and benefits of minimal access surgery, this new. Comparison between open and laparoscopic technique in the management of perforated gastroduodenal ulcers. It has not only allowed identifying the site and pathology of perforation, but also allowed closure of the perforation with better peritoneal lavage than in the open repair. The aims of this study is evaluating the efficacy, safety and outcome of laparoscopic surgery for perforated duodenal ulcers in comparison with conventional laparotomy, and also determine the risk factors which influence the outcome to identify those patients that are not good candidates for laparoscopic approach. Comparison of laparoscopic vs open repair for perforated duodenal ulcers article pdf available in surgical endoscopy 1912. Laparoscopic closure of perforated duodenal ulcer, surgical. Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer with omental. Feb 12, 2017 laparoscopic graham patch repair of a perforated marginal ulcer 6 yrs after rygb duration. The median age of the patients was 39 range 1973 years, and the majority were male n 180, 94%.

Laparoscopic omental patch repair lopr of perforated peptic ulcer. Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer ppu has become an accepted. Laparoscopic minimally invasive repair for perforated. The secondary aim was to evaluate the outcomes according to the severity of peritonitis. The development of laparoscopic surgery has changed the way to treat such abdominal surgical emergencies. This video is a stepbystep approach to the technique of laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer with omental patch. Omental patch repair for duodenal ulcer perforation analysis of factors affecting outcome. So jb, kum ck, femandes ml, goh p 1996 comparison between 10. We therefore believe that there is a need for comparison between.

Laparoscopic omental patch closure lopc has been performed in 7 patients of perforated duodenal ulcer in a period from january 1993 to the end of december 1994. In this report we aim to report our experience with laparoscopic repair of duodenal perforation. Primary repair of duodenal perforations with the omental patch technique has reemerged as the mainstay of treatment of this widelyprevalent condition, especially in our country. We have prospectively studied factors affecting outcome morbidity, mortality of duodenal ulcer perforations treated by omental patch technique, and have also attempted to study the efficacy. Comparison between laparoscopic and conventional omental patch repair for. Lap graham patch of duodenal ulcer general surgery coding. The only selection criterion was availability of expertise for laparoscopic. Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer with.

The earliest prospective studies from asia successfully demonstrated the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic repair 1, 2. Sutureless onlay omental patch for the laparoscopic repair. Omental patch repair of duodenal ulcer perforation is both simpler than and as effective as definitive ulcer surgery in the emergency situation 9. Takeuchi h, kawano t, toda t, minamisono y, hagasaki s, sugimachi k 1998 laparoscopic repair for perforation of duo denal ulcer with omental.

All patients who underwent omental patch repair at two universityaffiliated institutes. From january 2000 to september 2004, 38 patients with a diagnosis of perforated peptic ulcer were presented to the first and second authors. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers versus. Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer series of. An updated metaanalysis of laparoscopic versus open. Apr 01, 2016 all patients diagnosed clinically with perforated peptic ulcers, admitted to vs hospital during the period of january 20june 2014, were prospectively nonrandomized to undergo either conventional open or laparoscopic suture omental patch repair consent and cafeteria approach. Laparoscopic repair of duodenal perforation using the omental patch is one of the traditional techniques, which gives better postoperative recovery in patients with little chances of abdominal wound infection. Median duration of prehospital symptoms was eight hours and median time from admission to surgery. Sep 19, 2016 laparoscopic omental patch repair lopr of perforated peptic ulcer ppu was introduced two decades ago. Omental patch repair for duodenal ulcer perforation analysis. Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer causes less postoperative. Laparoscopic repair of duodenal perforation by hanging. The purpose of this study was to compare the early outcome results of laparoscopic and open repair and to propose which risk factors influence the outcome.

So jbykum ckfernandes mlgoh p comparison between laparoscopic and conventional omental patch repair for perforated duodenal ulcer. Omental patch repair for duodenal ulcer perforation. Historically, repair with the adjunct of an omental patch was considered the standard laparoscopic procedure for perforated peptic ulcer repair. Gohcomparison between laparoscopic and conventional omental patch repair for perforated duodenal ulcer surg endosc, 10 1996, pp. Evaluation of omental implantation for perforated gastric ulcer therapy. Lap graham patch of duodenal ulcer general surgery.

1534 1392 1529 1061 1141 203 640 416 270 506 700 1304 179 1456 431 970 1148 971 730 394 1396 518 263 1309 219 791 314 286 250 1204 689 1094 451